While that might not sound like much, it represents alarming growth in an imbalance that’s already larger than any in the past million years or more. Between 20, the Earth’s heating imbalance increased by nearly 20 percent, a direct consequence of the continued rise in human greenhouse gas emissions. Yet, the reality is that astonishingly much has changed - and not in the direction the creators of Inconvenient Truth would have hoped. It might be easy to conclude that little has changed over the past 10 years. The topic of climate change remains very much in the news, and we’re still struggling with the same public discourse - with familiar charges of scientific bias and media misrepresentation.
#Sequel to an inconvenient truth movie
It’s hard to believe that more than a decade has passed since “An Inconvenient Truth” first brought global warming to movie screens in 2006. In both roles, Gore has a grave lack of focus or self-awareness.In theaters for one month now, “An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power” has focused public attention upon the increasingly stark effects of global warming around the world - and the ongoing economic and political debates that will ultimately determine the fate of Earth’s climate future.Īgainst the backdrop of the unprecedented flood disaster currently unfolding in Houston, Texas, the film serves as a timely reminder of the sometimes tragic consequences when extreme weather, urban development and the effects of climate change collide. In some scenes he is miscast as the everyman, and in others he's miscast as a savior. Gore is always in the way, or putting his foot deep in his mouth like when he compares global warming to the civil rights movement or abolitionist movement. And that’s the huge problem with this messy movie, that it never gives us a chance to connect. Gore’s many speaking scenes are to people in his climate change group, which has the air of watching an evangelist preaching to the choir-a tactic that doesn't work for us as viewers, who need something to connect to. If any movie were to create the global warming idea as a type of cult, this is it. It has nothing to do with the issues at hand. The flaw of this moment is like others, in that its intent is purely adoration or pity. There are plenty of scenes that have nothing to do with global warming, like him walking us through his childhood home, talking about how he had planned to be president.
![sequel to an inconvenient truth sequel to an inconvenient truth](http://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1496193509i/34014330._UY630_SR1200,630_.jpg)
The two share many similarities: scenes with Miami floods, John Kerry, footage of Kiribati and India, and an Oscar-winner in the center who thinks he alone can get people to listen (in the case of “Before the Flood,” that was Leonardo DiCaprio).īut those are small nuggets to take from sifting through Gore’s self-centric version of the cause. In the scheme of global warming, what does this offer? A reminder, yes, particularly if you haven’t seen “ Before the Flood,” which played in 180+ countries via National Geographic. The second half focuses on Gore interacting with world leaders as a type of person behind the scenes, not as high-profile as a president. And we see how the global warming effort has quite the ally in solar power, as shown with India and the like. We see the different areas that are affected by the apocalyptic weather changes, and further recognize the scope of it. The movie only insulates itself more from there.Īs with global warming, there are tidbits of information that do come across, as Gore uses vivid footage of entire communities being destroyed by forces of nature. It takes far too long for this movie to situate into its actual causes, and to do so it’s back to the dull Al-Gore-gives-a-slideshow set-up. Questions of whether this movie is actually about Gore or his cause nag the entire movie, even though you know the project thinks it’s doing a noble job with the latter.
![sequel to an inconvenient truth sequel to an inconvenient truth](https://lwlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/an-inconvenient-sequel-al-gore.jpg)
Sobering footage of ruined glaciers and landscapes are accompanied by soundbites where people criticize Gore and his passion.
![sequel to an inconvenient truth sequel to an inconvenient truth](https://variety.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/al-gore.jpg)
But this return seems driven by even more vanity, with Gore unaware of how much he's talking about himself and not global warming.įrom the very beginning, the cause is framed as being personal. Adding a bit of cynicism to that title, "An Inconvenient Sequel" just wants to recreate the hits of the first time. The filmmaking by directors Bonni Cohen and Jon Shenk ("Audrie & Daisy") is solid, and they work with these very clear standards: follow Gore on his international speaking engagements, both during his meetings and maybe with a humanizing moment of him walking through a back hallway share the slide shows that he prepares for said speaking moments and make sure we can see it use an instructive score that could fit in with a political thriller.